Inspecting “Into the Water” by Paula Hawkins

Book Cover Challenge #4 Day

Hola, chicos!

I just finished reading “Into the Water” by the same author who wrote “The girl on the train” which is Paula Hawkins. I’ve been reading this book for 2 days. Not because of 368 pages but because of my busy-ness (today’s with Ammi’s work). So here is my thoughts about this book

Paula Hawkins made one of the most promising debuts (not actually) with The Girl on the Train which one I’ve read 2 days ago . I admired the book a lot due to its narrative structure, character build up and the shocking revelation. This is being the primary reason why I was so interested in the release of Into the Water. I found a Gillian Flynn in her style and couldn’t wait to know what she had in store for her fans with her new book. I like Gillian Flynn’s writing but not superly like btw. 😁😁. But maybe next book gonna be Gillian Flynn’s book, who knows? 😜

Note: I don’t know why this book couldn’t get me up. I just don’t get it, Paula Hawkins wanna make this more thriller but what is this, this much POVs? I didn’t even take any good pictures for this post, this book disappointed me enough. And I’m gonna kill 😜 Emma Isabella for this 😠. She told me to read it.

Hawkins’ sophomore novel has a decent plot.
A single mother turns up dead at the bottom of the river running through the town. But this is the second of its kind occurrence. Earlier in summer, a teenage girl had met the same fate. However, if we look into the past, these are not the first women to end up dead in the dark waters.

With the most current death, a fifteen-year-old girl is left behind with her mother’s sister who is adamant to find out the truth about her mother’s suicide.

For this book, I’m gonna highlight the point (😜 bads)

⭕Too Many POVs (point of view)

By the time you read the first 50 pages of Into the Water, you would have already read 6-7 different POVs. Each chapter written from someone else’s point of view. The book is divided into 4 parts and though I really thought that after first part, the different POVs will merge into one; that never happened. The entire novel follows the same pattern and that is the primary problem with the book.

For about 70% of the book, the plot goes nowhere; Into the Water keeps circling around the relationships of different people and their present circumstances; how they are dealing with the death(s). And you get to read it in their own narratives.

It was kinda confusing for me because after some time, it became difficult to keep a track of the characters. Cause this guy, I mean me, The Tanvir Rana Rabbi don’t like things difficult. I would often go back to find out who was related to whom in which way. By the time I was finished half way, things were dragging for me and I was irritated.

⭕None of the characters in the book were likeable.

So many POVs can be interesting if you start liking the characters as you dive deep into the chapters. However, there was not even a single character in “Into the Water” that was worth remembering which is kinda unfair to me. As I’m writing this review type thought about this book, I have already forgotten most of the names 😛. It’s why I have been refraining myself to mention names here. In her previous book The Girl on the Train, the characters were trashy in nature, but I still remember Rachel and Megan.🤩

⭕The Climax of Into the Water

By the time the book reached its climax, I was utterly and painfully exhausted. All I cared about was how to finish the book as soon as possible. I did not care who killed who or about the truth behind the suicide in question. I just wanted it to end.

The cumbersome narration made it difficult in the beginning and impossible after I was half done to be involved into the story and with the characters. If it means something to you, the climax was not even an ounce of hard hitting or shocking. In fact, the actions or reactions of the characters were somewhat unfathomable.

The only good thing her is the way she has painted the picture of the town and etched out different characters with different temperaments; only it was too many to keep a track.

Should you read this book?

It’s quite simple. If you hate to read a book with a dozen different POVs or if you are not a fan of slow paced fictions, I would definitely recommend to skip the book. I was expecting much from this book but it let me down, which I’m not fan of. I was thinking when this pages will finish, this situation hardly happened to me. Im giving 2 out of 7. And my suggestion to me, “Don’t read this Rabbi”

And this was the 4th day of the challenge which was given by শূণ্য গণি . And again I’m nominating myself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.